Five ingredients, and they are not equally supported. One has repeated human trials and a documented safety signal. Two have centuries of traditional use and almost no controlled data. This page ranks them honestly and then shows you the official store price.
Marks as supplied by the manufacturer. "FDA-registered facility" describes the premises where a product is made, not an approval of the product — the FDA does not approve dietary supplements. These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA.
One clearly, one partly, and three barely. Ashwagandha has repeated human trials on cortisol and perceived stress, which is a real and relevant finding for anyone whose drive is being flattened by stress. Maca has a genuine if modest literature on self-reported desire — notably without changing testosterone. Muira puama and catuaba are traditional botanicals with almost no controlled human data. L-arginine has a well-established mechanism at doses this format cannot deliver.
Applied in the same order to all five, which is what makes the ranking mean something.
Animal and in-vitro work suggests a mechanism. Only human trials suggest an effect. The gap between them is where most supplement marketing lives.
Uncontrolled studies on subjective outcomes like desire and energy are close to uninformative, because expectation does a lot of the work.
Ashwagandha's strongest data is on cortisol and stress scores — not on erectile function. Reporting it as the latter would be a sleight of hand.
An ingredient that works at 300 mg tells you nothing about the same ingredient at 15 mg. Dose is the difference between an ingredient and a decoration.
Ashwagandha has a documented, uncommon association with liver injury. That belongs on the page next to the benefits, not buried.
Traditional use is a legitimate reason to investigate a plant. It is not a substitute for having investigated it.
Quality marks as supplied by the manufacturer. They describe the manufacturing standard, not a clinical result.
Jelly Force is a chewable men's vitality supplement, 30 gummies to a bottle. The official page positions it as a natural male supplement for stamina and performance, "specifically tailored to avoid dependency and particularly beneficial for older men."
The formula names four botanicals — muira puama, maca, catuaba and ashwagandha — plus the amino acid L-arginine. The label states 82 mg per serving in total, equivalent to about 567 mg of dry powders. The split between the five is not published.
It is a dietary supplement, not a treatment. It is not FDA-approved, because no dietary supplement is, and nothing on this site suggests it treats erectile dysfunction or any other medical condition. If that is what you are dealing with, the right first step is a doctor, not a gummy.
Order Now
Strongest first. The ordering is ours; the descriptions in quotation marks are the manufacturer's.
The one with real human trials. Repeated studies find reductions in cortisol and in perceived stress. That is a plausible route to better drive — chronic stress is one of the clearest suppressors of it — but it is an indirect route, and worth stating as such.
A modest but genuine literature, mostly on self-reported sexual desire. The consistent and slightly surprising finding is that it does this without measurable changes in testosterone, which is a point in favour of taking the trials at face value.
Two traditional Amazonian and Brazilian botanicals with very thin controlled data, and one amino acid with a solid mechanism at doses a gummy cannot carry. Long traditional use is a reason to investigate a plant, not a finding about it.
One is a safety point and one is a framing point. Both belong before the buy button rather than after it.
Uncommon but documented cases of liver injury are associated with ashwagandha supplements, enough that public health bodies list it. If you have liver disease, drink heavily, or take medication processed by the liver, ask a doctor first.
A supplement aimed at stress, desire and general vigour is not a treatment for erectile dysfunction, which frequently has a cardiovascular or hormonal cause worth diagnosing. Persistent difficulty is a reason to see a doctor, not to increase a dose.
Official store prices. The page publishes totals only, so no struck-through price appears here and the per-bottle figures are simple division.
Payment is processed by the manufacturer. This site never sees your card details.
The official order page publishes no former or "regular" price for any bundle, so this page shows none — a strikethrough we cannot source would be an invented reference price. The per-bottle figures are the published totals divided by the bottle count.
The manufacturer's description of each, in quotation marks, followed by ours. Nothing is blended between the two.
The manufacturer's line: "commonly used for male libido, energy, and performance support." It is an Amazonian bark with a long traditional record and a thin modern one — the human trials that exist are small, old and mostly uncontrolled.
Described on the official page as "a Peruvian root famous for boosting vitality, stamina." Maca is the better-studied of the two roots here, and the interesting detail is that trials tend to find effects on self-reported desire without changes in testosterone.
"A traditional Brazilian herb associated with libido enhancement and natural stimulation," per the official page. Traditional use is genuine; controlled human data is close to absent. Treat it as a traditional inclusion rather than an evidenced one.
"An adaptogenic herb often used to reduce stress and support physical and mental energy." This is the best-evidenced ingredient in the formula, with repeated human data on cortisol and perceived stress — and the one with a documented safety signal worth reading about before you start.
"An amino acid linked to nitric oxide production, helping support blood flow and performance." The mechanism is real and uncontroversial. The catch is arithmetic: clinical work on arginine uses grams, and this label's entire serving is 82 mg across five ingredients.
No ingredient photograph is supplied by the manufacturer for L-Arginine.
These three figures are printed on the packaging rather than in the sales copy, which is why most pages about this product do not mention them.
Printed on the front of the bottle. That is the total extract weight across all five named ingredients, not the amount of any one of them — a detail that changes how the formula should be read.
The label's own footnote. It describes a concentrated extract: 82 mg of extract standing in for roughly 567 mg of the raw herb, which is a ratio of about 7:1.
On the label, and consistent with the bundles being sold as 60, 90 and 180-day supplies. The official page does not state a daily dose in words, so follow the directions printed on the bottle you receive.
What is not on the label: the split of the 82 mg between the five named ingredients, any standardisation percentage, and the plant part used for each botanical. We do not estimate any of those. If they matter to your decision, ask the seller in writing before you order.
The manufacturer's claims, reproduced as claims. Not evaluated by the FDA; individual results vary.
The ashwagandha mechanism, and the best-supported route in this formula.
Where maca's trials point, without measurable hormonal change.
The official page's central positioning for the formula as a whole.
Claimed for L-arginine. The mechanism is real; the dose in a gummy is not the studied one.
Muira puama and catuaba, included on the strength of long traditional use.
The official page states the formula is tailored to avoid dependency.
No dosing sentence appears on the official page, so the bottle is the authority.
The order page gives no daily amount in words. Use what is printed on the bottle you receive.
Adaptogens do not work as single doses. The evidence for ashwagandha comes from studies running weeks, not from one gummy before an occasion.
That is the realistic window. If nothing has shifted in stress, sleep or energy by then, adding months is unlikely to change the answer.
The official order page states it plainly: contact within the first 60 days of purchase, send back all bottles, even empty ones, and the purchase is refunded. Refunds are handled by the seller. This website has no access to any order and cannot process, look up or amend one.
That condition is ordinary in this category and it is also the most common reason a claim fails, because the bottles are usually gone by week three. If there is any chance you will claim, keep every container — including the sealed ones from a larger bundle — for at least 61 days, and confirm the return address in writing before posting anything.
The page does not state who pays return shipping. Ask in your first email rather than assuming, and use a tracked service — a refund conditional on receipt is a refund conditional on proving receipt. Terms are the seller's and can change without notice to us.
Five ingredients are named on the official page: muira puama extract, maca extract, catuaba extract, ashwagandha and L-arginine. The bottle states 82 mg per serving in total, described as equivalent to approximately 567 mg of dry powders. The split between the five is not published, and we do not invent one.
Thirty, per the label. The bundles are sold as 60, 90 and 180-day supplies, which implies one a day, though the official order page states no daily amount in words. Follow the directions printed on the bottle you receive.
Sixty days from the date of purchase. The official page's stated condition is that you send back all bottles, including empty ones. Refunds are handled by the seller, not by this website — keep your order confirmation and every container.
The official page states worldwide delivery with a stated maximum of 60 days, and free US shipping on the 3 and 6-bottle bundles. The 2-bottle order carries a $9.90 shipping charge.
Ashwagandha, by a clear margin — repeated randomised human trials on cortisol and perceived stress. That is an indirect route to drive rather than a direct performance effect, and it is worth being precise about the difference.
For most people at ordinary doses, yes. There is a documented and uncommon association with liver injury, catalogued in NIH's LiverTox database. Anyone with liver disease, on liver-metabolised medication, with a thyroid condition, or who drinks heavily should ask a doctor first.
Both have long traditional use and very little controlled human evidence. Traditional use is a legitimate reason to investigate a plant; it is not a result. We would not buy this formula for either of them.
No, and it should not be used as one. Persistent erectile difficulty often has a cardiovascular or hormonal cause that is worth diagnosing, and it is a reason to see a doctor rather than to buy a supplement.
You have the ingredients and the evidence behind each. Official store pricing, free US shipping on 3 and 6 bottles, 60-day money-back guarantee.
Check Official PricingFree US shipping on 3 & 6 bottles · 60-day money-back guarantee · prices set by the official store